Supreme court
15 Dec 2020 11:22 PM
SC Issues Notice 'With
Caution" On PILs For Uniform Law For Divorce, Maintenance and Alimony
Do You Want To Abolish
Personal Laws, How Can We Encroach On It remarked SC
Case Facts
·
A three judge bench of the Supreme Court
(SC) comprising of CJI SA Bobde, J. AS Bopanna and J. V Ramasubramanian issued
notice on two Public Interest Litigations seeking uniformity in the personal
laws regulating divorce, maintenance and alimony for Indian citizens.
· Senior Advocate Pinky Anand appearing for the petitioner Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay. prayed that these personal laws and religious practices are discriminatory under Art. 14, 15 and 44 of Indian Constitution as well as other rights conferred under International Instruments.
· Ms. Anand put reliance on the Shayara Bano case where the Supreme Court had recently declared the practice of Triple Talaq as being unconstitutional. She also referred to the Sarla Mudgal case wherein directions were issued by the Top Court to the Government under Art. 44 in a conflict between personal laws and matters relating to marriage.
The
petitioner has sought following direction from the Court.
1. Direction
to Union Home and Law Ministry to take appropriate steps to remove the
prevailing anomalies in the grounds of maintenance and alimony in order to make
them uniform for all citizens without discrimination on the basis of religion
race cast sex or place of birth in spirit of the Articles 14, 15, 21, 44 and
International Conventions
2. Alternatively,
being custodian of the Constitution and protector of the fundamental rights,
declare that the discriminatory grounds of maintenance and alimony are
violative of Articles 14, 15, 21 of the Constitution and frame gender neutral
religion neutral uniform guidelines for maintenance and alimony for all Indian
citizens;
3. Alternatively,
direct the Law Commission of India to examine the domestic and international
laws and prepare a report on 'uniform grounds of maintenance and alimony'
within 3 months in spirit of the Articles 14, 15, 21 & 44 and international
conventions;
4. A
Constitution seeking 'Uniform Grounds of Divorce' for all citizens throughout
the territory of India in spirit of Articles 14, 15, 21, 44 of the Constitution
and International Conventions.
·
Ms. Meenakshi Arora representing another
petitioner argued that the case comprises of a larger issue. She said
"Religious practices are one thing. But constitutional rights are another.
When religious practices directly infringe the Fundamental Rights, they cannot
be said to be protected."
The bench issued notice
in the case, however, while doing CJI remarked "We are issuing notice with
great caution."