WHAT IS COMMERCIAL PURPOSE AS DEFINED IN CONSUMER
PROTECTION ACT
After
amendment 2002 in the consumer protection Act 1986 , suddenly all the doors for
commercial units were closed and they were barred from going to consumer
forums for their redressal .But National
Commission in 2004 vide order dated 3.12.04 clarified number of doubts
on the issue of definition of consumer in its elaborated judgment
pronounced by Justice M B Shah taking up two appeals together namely M/S
Harsolia Motors Vs M/S National Insurance co. Ltd ,M/S Diwakar Goiram Porkhayat
Vs m/s national Insurance Co. Ltd and also in M/S Tractor House Vs./S National
Insurance Co. Ltd .This judgment referred to earlier decided cases by the apex
court wherein the meaning of commercial purpose was explained as back as 1995
in case of Luxmi engineering works Vs PSG Institute[1995]3 SCC 585.and lately
in New Delhi municipal corporation vs. Sohan lal Sachdeva[2002] 2 SCC 494
wherein commerce and commercial purpose is defined and distinguished
The basic
question for adjudication was whether insurance policy taken by commercial
units could be held to be hiring of services for commercial purpose and thereby
excluded from the preview of the Consumer Protection Act.The words for
explanation before the commission were commercial purpose, commerce, services,
and mainly services of insurance hired, taken ,availed by the insurer. Crux
of the whole discussion in this order is explained in the following manner:
1 Taking insurance policy by an individual is a service under the act.
2 Taking insurance policy by a commercial unit running its business is a
service as far as it is limited to indemnification of the actual loss suffered
by the insurer under the act but cannot be considered service taken if taken license
and registered for doing business of insurance.
For coming to this conclusion, commission has gone far ahead in explaining as
to how in one situation services hired or availed is a service for
commercial purpose and in other situation not commercial purpose by giving
reference to earlier decided case of Luxmi Engineering Works Ltd in 1995.
And it has been emphasized-
·
If a
typewriter is used for typing by the person for himself and a car purchased for
his own driving for self employment – it is not for commercial purpose but if a
typewriter is purchased and is being used for other person for giving typing
services to others for profit or loss by a commercial unit it is a commercial purpose.
·
Similarly
a car driven as taxi by employees of commercial unit for giving transport
services is a commercial purpose but car used by an officer of the unit for his
own use is not a commercial purpose
The issue had again come up before the
National Commission due to varied interpretations in two cases. Noticing
an apparent conflict in the decisions rendered by National Commission in two cases namely Controls and
Switchgear Company Ltd.& others
V/S Daimler Chrysler India Pvt.
Ltd. and T and T Motors Ltd. IV (2007) CPJ 1 (NC) & others decided on 07.02.2013,
both rendered by Benches comprising two Members, now Consumer
Case No. 51 of 2006. D/d. 8.7.2016 had came up before larger bench comprising
three judges Mr. Justice D.K. Jain, President, Mr. Justice V.K. Jain and Dr.
B.C. Gupta,
In
Controls and Switchgear Company Ltd. (supra), a complaint alleging defects in
two Mercedes Benz, cars purchased by the complainant company for the use of its
directors, was filed before this Commission. The complaint was resisted
inter-alia on the ground that the cars were purchased for a commercial purpose.
Rejecting the contention, this Commission inter-alia held as under:
“The
cars are purchased for the use of the Directors and are not to be used for any
activity directly connected with commercial purpose of earning profit. Cars are
not used for hire but are for the personal use of the Directors. Hence, it
cannot be said that the complainant company has purchased the cars for
commercial purpose.”
An
appeal against the above-referred decision is pending before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court.
In
General Motors Pvt. Ltd. (supra), a complaint alleging defect in a car
purchased by the complainant company for use of its Managing Director was filed
before the concerned State Commission. The complaint was resisted inter-alia on
the ground that purchase of the vehicle for the use of the Managing Director of
the company amounted to purchase for a commercial purpose. Accepting the said
contention, this Commission inter-alia held as under
“We
agree with Appellants’ contention that this clearly amounts to its purchase for
a ‘commercial purpose’ since the Managing Director of a private limited company
would obviously not use this vehicle for self-employment to earn his livelihood
but for ‘commercial purposes’ as a perk of his office.”
The
above two judgments led to controversy and now National commission further
clarified the concept of commercial purpose referring to supreme court
judgments through this Consumer Case No. 51 of
2006. Crompton Greaves Limited& others V/S … Daimler
Chrysler India Private Limited &others D/d. 8.7.2016 by three judges:- Mr.
Justice D.K. Jain, President, Mr. Justice V.K. Jain and Dr. B.C. Gupta, Members
(larger ) bench in the following manner-
As observed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Laxmi
Engineering Works (supra), it is not the value of the goods but the purpose for
which the goods are brought or put to use, which is relevant to decide whether
the goods were obtained for a commercial purpose or not. The same would be the
position, where services are hired or availed by a company. If the business
activities of a company cannot be conveniently undertaken without the goods
purchased or the services hired or availed by a company, such purchase or
hiring/availing as the case may be, would be for a commercial purpose, because
the objective behind such purchase of goods or hiring or availing of the
services would be to enable the company to earn profits by undertaking and
advancing its business activities.
The
goods and services made available by a company to its directors or employees
can be classified into the following three broad categories:-
(a)
The goods and services which are obtained for and made available to the
directors or employees of the company and are used by them only for their
personal purposes, unconnected with the business of the company. For instance,
the cars used by the directors and employees of the company for their shopping,
outings, recreations, etc. or for commuting to and from the office of the
company. Another example can be the air conditioners and furniture provided at
the residence of the directors and employees of the company or the telephone or
broadband got installed by the company at their residence. This does not amount
to commercial purpose because the purpose is to make certain facilities and
amenities available to the directors and employees of the company as a part of
the incentive offered to them by the company, as a reward or remuneration for
the work which they are expected to perform for the company
(b)
The goods and services made available to the directors or employees of the
company and used by them primarily for their personal purposes but
incidentally, also for the purposes of the company. For instance, a car used
mainly for outings, recreations, personal commuting etc. of the directors and
employees or their families, but also for visiting the factory and offices of
the company or attending the business meetings. This also does not amount to
commercial purpose
(c)
The goods and services made available by a company to its directors and
employees primarily for the purposes of the company and used by them mainly for
the purposes of the company but incidentally also for their personal purposes.
For instance, a vehicle purchased for being used as a staff car or a delivery
van, but sometimes also used for the personal purposes of the directors or
employees, unrelated to the business of the company. This manner vehicle is
used for commercial purpose because of direct nexus with the business.
It
is ample clear now that in cases of company filing complaint as consumer, facts
and circumstances are the important factor; merely ‘for the use of director of
the company’ is not a sufficient ground for declaring commercial purpose
Dr Prem Lata
Become a Member of the new revolution "Consumer Awakening" and instantly expand your knowledge with the Important Landmark Judgements, Laws Laid down by the Supreme Court for Consumer Rights, Get access to hundreds of Featured Articles in 2 different Languages; English and Hindi - a valuable professional resource to draw upon, and a powerful, collective voice to advocate for your protection of rights as a consumer nationwide.
Thank you for your interest in becoming a "Consumer Awakening" Member!
You will find information on Customer Rights, what we're doing and how to become a member. If you are looking forward to become a member of our portal and gain access to Hundreds of Featured Articles which will clearly give you an insight of yoru rights as a Consumer, then Read Further. more detail on our technologies and technology process,